دانلود کتاب مشاوره پویا با روانپزشکان برای درک بیماران شدید

This publication developed from a collaboration across more than 10 years between hospital psychiatrists and JM. JM’s contact with these psychiatrists started with a series of interprofessional consultations. JM was invited to conduct an educational event in their country twice. The first was on the introduction of Group Analysis and the second was a comparison between Group and Individual analyses. The consultation sessions were often referred to as “supervision sessions,” but this was a misnomer. JM was not in a position to supervise the work of any doctor working in a different setting and, more so, in a different country. JM had no wish to intervene in the hierarchy that has to exist in a well-functioning hospital with the inevitable lines of accountability and responsibility. Furthermore, supervision would be against the ethos of arriving at a new insight via collaboration of professionals of varying experiences in different fields. For example, the doctors in training were more aware of the culture of their patients and often taught consultant (JM) quite bit but who was also not ignorant of their culture and history. The consultations were meant to be and were, indeed, a two-way process. JM feels that he benefited from the process at least as much as the consultees. A local doctor took the initiative to organize this series of consultations that would be available to psychiatrists in training at their hospital. Successors in her role took up the torch with enthusiasm. In this way, consultations between hospital trainees and JM were established monthly and were conducted via video conferencing. The hospital’s ethical committee approved the project. The hospital authority insisted that extra care be taken to preserve patient confidentiality. No case was discussed without the patient’s consent. Furthermore, the names of patients were fictitious, the names of doctors and of hospitals were withheld, and any reference to the country was deleted. JM was impressed by the high standard of practice at the hospital, by the receptiveness of the trainees to analytical concepts, and by their willingness to learn from the experience. It is a credit to all participants that, over the years, only one or two consultations were canceled, and these were for good reasons. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was an unavoidable interruption. The trainees were not able to meet as a group because of the risk of increasing the transmission of the virus. Due to the commitment of the doctors, a Zoom account was established, and the meetings restarted with each participant engaging via their own terminal.