دانلود کتاب بازاندیشی اقتصاد سیاسی مدیریت مهاجرت غیرغربی

This volume proposes a new way to think about global migration governance and positions the political economy of non-Western migration regimes at the centre of our analysis. We argue that these contexts are constitutive of global migration regimes and essential to any robust theory of the political economy of migration. We propose a concept of Assemblages of Migration to provide a lens for understanding migration governance as historically sedimented, polycentric, infrastructural, stratified, embodied and co-produced. This framework departs from models that treat migration as a functional system or a state-driven regime, instead emphasising the provisional, contested, and heterogeneous character of global migration governance. This edited volume brings together articles that explore migration in regions outside of the traditional Western migrant-receiving countries of North America, Western Europe, and Australia from a multidisciplinary and comparative perspective. The scale of international migration has witnessed a continuous increase in recent years, propelled by a confluence of economic transformations, shifts in political landscapes, and a myriad of other influencing factors. This surge in migration _lows has notably expanded beyond the confines of traditional destinations in the West, or what is commonly referred to as the Global North. For instance, around half of the estimated 282 million international migrants worldwide live and work in non-Western countries (IOM, 2024). There are more people migrating from one country to another within the Global South than there are people moving from the Global South to the Global North (Crawley & Teye, 2024; World Bank, 2016). Moreover, recent data from the World Migration Report indicates a significant shift in migration patterns, with 12 of the top 20 destinations for international migrants in 2020 being non-Western countries (IOM, 2024). Despite this trend, non- Western contexts remain largely under-represented in global migration studies, with a disproportionate amount of research concentrated on North America, Western Europe, and Australia. Much of the existing literature on migration predominantly focuses on the experiences of migrants and immigration policies within Western liberal democracies (Düvell, 2020; Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, 2020; Natter, 2018; Urinboyev, 2020). For instance, 80% of articles published in the International Migration Review, a leading journal in the _ield, since 2016 focus geographically on North America or Western Europe (IOM, 2019, p. 68). This geographic bias not only limits our understanding of non- Western migration dynamics but also poses challenges for scholars attempting to contextualise their work within prevailing perspectives dominated by Western regions. Major non-Western migration destinations such as Argentina, China, the Gulf states, Indonesia, Russia, South Africa and Turkey are particularly overlooked in existing theories and comparative research within migration studies. As a result, migration scholarship predominantly revolves around the Global North, with a notable overemphasis on migration from South to North, as well as between Northern regions. Moreover, existing migration literature heavily draws upon theories and concepts originating from the Global North, resulting in a biased understanding. Not only does this approach fail to include much of the empirical experience from the global south in its theorising, it fails to challenge the intersecting inequalities that drive and shape migratory patterns.