دانلود کتاب آندرولوژی بالینی عملی

Traditionally, the andrologist had first defined himself as a physiopathologist and doctor of male reproduction, over time discovering the need to recognize sexuality, and not just the reproductive act, as an object of clinical interest. The reasons for this delay are not only the daughters of cultural heritage unwilling to recognize that sex and repro­duction in the human species do not necessarily coincide, but also rather in the enormous cultural delay that sexology had, and in some ways still has, towards reproductive pathophysiology. The use of the Galilean method, humus and irreplace­able culture medium for andrology and sexual medicine, has not been considered as indispens­able by generations of so-called, more or less self-defined, sexologists. Nor can it be blamed on these alone. The Italian medical schools where the word “sexology” or “sex” or “sexual dysfunction” appear in the students’ curriculum are still very few: even today it is possible to graduate in medi­cine and surgery without having received formal lessons and clinical training on some of the most widespread and most dramatically impacting human pathologies on the quality of life of the population: sexual dysfunctions.