دانلود کتاب حقوق زیستی – پارادایم حفاظت نئو اقتصادی برای جنوب جهانی

Economics of environmental services has been emerging as an academic discipline for many decades now. However, as an operational guiding principle, this is becom­ing as an essential domain of knowledge both for academia as well as among the practitioners to resolve the problem of allocating the monetary values to non-mar­keted nature’s goods and services including biodiversity. However, in the ‘Climate Change’ discourse, the significance has been felt more urgently as the debate around role of ecosystem/natural capital is gaining more and more prominence due to accelerated action towards global sustainability. Both adaptive and mitigative actions are evaluating the potential for ecosystem-based solutions.

Academia has systematically developed scientific arguments and logical frame­work to expand the concept of capital as a major driver of economic growth through portfolio approach to cover natural capital among other forms of capital to represent role of environmental services in context of economic growth. So, equity and ineq­uity in capital ownership have also been extended to the domains of natural capital keeping in mind the inclusion in decision-making process and empowerment. This has been used to address several aspects and issues of socioecological and socioeco­nomic significance like gender inequity, equitable access to resources, traditional and indigenous knowledge, community preparedness, and women empowerment in designing sustainable development models. Community rights on natural capital and its implications on natural resource management/transfer of rights is one such area of research that tries to enunciate the pros and cons of community-led conser­vation and its rights to access nature’s goods and services, as well from integrative aspect to macroeconomic perspective.